Wednesday, 7 September 2016

10 best art installations in 2015


Last year was rich in terms of exhibitions, presentations and galleries. Let us summarize, the best works according to the magazine.

The Infinity” Yayoi Kusama works by the artist, which is located in the center of modern art in Denmark
2016-03-jan-installation-si-1017
Installation entitled “Love” height of about 7 m was formed from a polyester resin and a metallic reinforcement. The plot in a litter of adults in which children suffer.
2015-12-27-Dec-Installations2015-Styleinsider-0717
The national museum in Washington was posted installation “The Beach”
In millions of plastic balls. The idea of design was the implication that it is possible to have fun without harming the environment. Balls were made of recycled plastic.


Friday, 19 August 2016

10 Wedding Traditions With Surprising Origins

9 Throwing the Garter
This practice, as it turned out, was devised as a way to actually physically protect the bride from the wedding guests.

The tradition of throwing the wedding garter may be unusual, but it's less intrusive than the tradition that preceded it.
   It derives from a tradition in medieval England and France called "fingering the stocking." Guests would actually go into the wedding chamber and check the bride's stockings for signs that the marriage had been consummated. Further, in France, the bride would shudder with terror at the end of the wedding ceremony because guests would actually rush her at the altar to snag a piece of her dress, which was considered a piece of good luck.
   A wedding would end with a battered bride sobbing at the altar in a snarl of tattered rags.
   Apparently, these practices were so intrusive and invasive that someone, somewhere, decided to pacify the mob by tossing out the garter.
Bridesmaids' Dresses
   If you dread showing your selection of dresses to your bridesmaids, consider this: The earliest tradition in bridesmaid fashion involved dressing the bridesmaids exactly the same as the bride. As with many older traditions, the idea was that by setting up lookalikes, any troublesome spirits in the area could not fixate on the bride.
   That custom gave way in Victorian times to dressing bridesmaids in white dresses but short veils, to contrast with the bride's voluminous veiling and train system. When society's fears of evil spirits subsided and commercial dyes became more available, those first hideous dresses made their appearance. In colors like lime green, harvest gold, tangerine and fuchsia, those dresses all ensured that the bride would be the best-looking girl in the church.
Not that any bride would ever consciously do this.
The Bridal Veil
   The veiling of the bride has origins in the idea that she's vulnerable to enchantment, so she must be hidden from evil spirits. The Romans veiled brides in flame-colored veils to actually scare off those spirits.
   Perhaps the most evil of spirits, in an arranged marriage, is the threat that the groom, who is perhaps seeing the bride for the first time, won't like what he sees. The veil saves everyone some embarrassment in the short term.
   Also, in many religions, the veil is a sign of humility and respect before God during a religious ceremony.
The wedding veil probably originated as a way to ward off evil and protect the purity of the bride.
   The Victorians turned that reverence into a status symbol. During Victorian times, when archaic customs were formally incorporated into proper weddings, the weight, length and quality of the veil was a sign of the bride's status. Royal brides had the longest veils and the longest trains.
   In modern times, generally we have some assurance that the groom has seen his bride and won't be disappointed, and that the only evil spirits will be the ones behind the bar at the reception. The tradition has become more of a finishing touch in wedding fashion. It's the icing on the cake, so to speak, that pulls together the hair and the dress.
The Honeymoon
    If you want to really extrapolate links to tradition, the honeymoon is a carryover from the days when grooms abducted their brides from the neighbors. ("Will you take this woman?" Well, for a lot of human history, that's exactly what the groom did.)
Through time, those abductions became fun-filled, ritualized enactments of capturing brides. Those escapades, in Norse tradition, led to a tradition in which the bride and groom went into hiding for 30 days. During each of those days, a friend or family member would bring them a cup of honey wine, so that 30 days of consumption equaled a "honeymoon."
Wedding and Engagement Rings
    Whether this is a legitimate long-held tradition or not is subject to some debate, because the whole category has been corrupted by commerce.
   Some sources report that the Romans and Egyptians recorded the use of wedding rings. There's also chatter about the ring being a less restrictive symbol of the hand and foot bindings of a captured bride. (As for abduction -- that's a real tradition.) A pope in the 12th century decreed that weddings would be held in church and that the brides were to receive rings. He also decreed that the time between engagement and marriageshould be lengthened, which boosted interest in engagement rings.
   But those rings didn't have diamonds.
    There's no dispute that DeBeers singlehandedly created the market for the diamond engagement ring with a simple sentiment in a 20th-century ad campaign: A Diamond is Forever.
As it turned out, the slogan might outlast the product, as socially conscious brides steer away from the products of the war-torn diamond industry.
The Big, Elaborate, Showy Wedding
   So as you put down a $5,000 deposit here and a $3,000 deposit there, you feel reassured that these big checks are linking you to tradition. Throughout history, the families of brides have shelled out enormous sums of money to put on good parties. Right?
Well, no. That's not entirely right.
   While the aristocratic families in some cultures have always put on expensive weddings to show their place in society, the traditional American wedding was more like a barn raising.
In fact, among frontier families, the lack of access to a preacher led to the acknowledgement -- and legalization -- of common-law marriages, where a couple who moves in together receives all the rights and privileges of marriage.
   In more established communities, the bride's female family members and friends would hold special quilting circles to embroider and create her trousseau. The ceremonies, the receptions and the setting up of households were all-encompassing community events.
   Then the society families started collecting gifts.
Apparently there's a whole literature surrounding the recording of gifts, the photographing of gift tables and the praising or humiliation of the gift-givers, based upon the lavishness of their donations. And, well, if it was good enough for the rich, then it was good enough for everyone else, too.
    So you had to have the invitations. You had to have the catered meal. And, in more modern times, there's the tip of the hat to your donors in the party favors, which can be incredibly elaborate.
So the big wedding originates from perhaps the strangest phenomenon of all -- the consumer society. Conspicuous consumption. The mass messages coming in from advertising and going out through social networking.
But, of course, it's been going on for well over a century now. So perhaps it's only fair to call it tradition.
Jumping the Broom
    While trendy African-American couples sometimes incorporate this ritual into modern ceremonies, their great-great-grandparents might not have approved.
   The practice of jumping the broom started in slave times, when it was actually illegal for slaves to marry. Nonetheless, the people on the plantations sought to form bonds that were acknowledged by the community, so they jumped the broom together in lieu of a legal wedding.
Jumping the broom originated during the time of slavery as a symbolic way of leaping into a new life.
   Historians note that freed slaves taught their children to disdain the practice, because to them, it was a symbol of bondage. However, the poignant scene in Alex Haley's "Roots," in which Kunta Kinte jumped the broom on the plantation with his bride, led to a revival of the custom. In that scene, the captive from Africa is not accepting his captivity, but he is acknowledging a powerful bond with another person despite being trapped in a life he didn't choose.
    Despite their ancestors' distaste for the practice, some modern couples incorporate jumping the broom into their ceremonies as a connection to a painful but significant part of their heritage.
Tying Tin Cans to the Bumper of the Car
    OK, so you've thrown a wedding and invited the whole neighborhood, and you're tired. An hour or so after you go to sleep, all your friends turn out and bang pots and pans under your windowsill, and you're expected to reappear in full wedding attire and feed the rowdies so they'll go away.
   Sound like fun? Probably not. But this was the shivaree, which was practiced on the American frontier into the early 20th century.
The American version originated in France, where communities would conduct a charivari for widowers or grooms from out of town. These grooms, outsiders who had effectively snatched a local girl out of the clutches of the local boys, were to pay a toll to the offended locals by offering a midnight meal.
    Early French settlers brought the practice to the Mississippi Valley in the 1600s, and other settlers caught on. The midnight parties became an event that grooms worked to deflect; historians cite cases where prosperous ranchers would throw enormous barbecues for the community just to avoid getting "shivaree'd."
    Tying the tin cans on the bumper may serve as a poor substitution for an all-night party, but it's interesting to note that the decorating of the car is generally done by the groom's male friends -- men who effectively have lost their chances with the bride who's being whisked away.
The Breaking of the Glass
    The conclusion of a Jewish wedding, with its layers of symbolic practices, often ends with the groom crushing a wine glass under his heel.
    Like many traditions in Jewish weddings, such as standing under the Chuppah and the bride circling the groom seven times, the breaking of the glass can symbolize many things. But the chief connotation is that the breaking of the glass serves as a reminder of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, the most holy place in all of Jewish history. Another connotation is that it reminds the couple of the fragility of the relationship and the need to preserve it.
    In some cases, modern couples may find the practice a somewhat oppressive burden in its reminder of thousands of years of history. But then, isn't that what tradition is for?
For more wedding and tradition articles, check out the links on the next page.

Tradition Française

Tradition means the future!


   Our French tradition flour is fully compliant with the French decree on bread of 1993, which revolutionized the art of bakery: aside from a European regulation enabling the incorporation of improvers in bread-making flour, a French cultural exception was made for a type of flour which is guaranteed free from additives. Produced with the best wheat varieties, this T65 flour is perfect to make the famous French traditional baguette which seduces more and more consumers every day.
   We are happy that many of our clients distinguished themselves in competitions by making their baguettes with this flour.

It’s Okay To Break Tradition

Tradition is an interesting thing. It’s the way things are. It’s the way things have always been. You go with the flow, because that’s how things are done. You know it as the status quo.  
The status quo is a good thing, because tradition is tried and true. Why else would you do things the same way for so long?
Why—that’s the question. And it is a very important question.
Sometimes the answer is a reasonable one: You do it this way, because it has been proven to be the best way.
Unfortunately, the answer is often a self-referencing let-down: It’s always been done this way because this is how it has always been done. In other words, nobody remembers why, so we just carry on the tradition.

Historical Tradition

Old typewriter keys close up.







History is teeming with examples of unchallenged assumptions that often leave us wondering why things are the way they are. You’ve likely heard of some of the more popular ones (although some are controversial).

Typewriters were designed with the QWERTYlayout to prevent jamming when the operator types popular key combinations too quickly. This makes no sense on computer keyboards today, but the layout is still entrenched as the standard.
NASA rockets have design restrictions that have made their shuttles longer and narrower than preferred. This is a strange consequence due to the origin of railway gauge (the spacing between the two tracks), which has a long history of following tradition, dating all the way back to Roman chariots.

My Personal Case Study

About four years ago, my employer decided to replace the custom software solution for our network of dealer-owners. We had a home-grown point-of-sale with an integrated inventory system, which was built from the ground up for our business. However, we needed to replace our product because it used dated technology and required an integrated general ledger.
Bolting on such invasive and fundamental functionality was not ideal, so our business analysts decided it would be better to replace our home-grown solution with Microsoft Dynamics NAV, which we could further customize to fit our needs.
Fast forward to a year later. Our developers and business analysts have been trained on Dynamics NAV development and basic workflows. We are now working alongside some experienced consultants to begin customizing the product. Things are going well and we are picking up velocity.
Then, we realize something isn’t quite right. We are developing a software solution, but we are not using source control.
Copyright text 2016 by Simple Programmer. Powered by Thrive Themes

What are the advantages of oral tradition?

What are the advantages of oral tradition?
    Oral tradition benefits transmission of cultural values and first-hand historical events in a way that makes listeners more active participants in receiving information. This helps people retain what they learn and generates individuals who are capable of continuing these oral traditions.
   Using oral tradition as a means of passing along stories and histories keeps the human element intact within the events that occurred. It grants a first-person perspective or a collective look at the conditions of a people during a specific period and relates details that create emotional responses among listeners.
  Implementing oral tradition is part of many cultural experiences and dates back to points in the past when these groups had no written language or the tools to create documents that stand the test of time. Oral tradition remains a part of cultural awareness and is of great historical value in parts of the world where this continues to be the case so that the past remains alive in the minds of present and future people.
Source:https://www.reference.com/world-view/advantages-oral-tradition-e585d2a8485297c1

Julian Stodd's Learning

\

Tradition and Change

We talk of tradition with reverence: it’s age conveys status and permanence. Hallowed and respected, mythic and old. To talk of change is heresy: change is modern, change is clean, change is unfettered by the shackles of history. Tradition is wood panelled, soot stained and aged for eighteen years with a peaty taste. Change is oily and metallic, plastic and glass.
Tradition and Change
We hold onto tradition and fear change.
And yet nothing is forever.
   A Christmas card arrived from the Netherlands this week, on it, Zwarte Pete, a traditional character who acts as Santa’s helper. But only in the Netherlands. Because anywhere else, it would be unheard of to have a character called ‘Black Pete‘, who is played by a young man wearing black makeup. It would be offensive. When i grew up, there was a range of marmalade whose logo was a similar character, finally outlawed in 2001. Their position became untenable: a hundred years of history was no defence for modern sensibilities. When i grew up, it was common to see that character as a cuddly toy, loved by children. Today, i won’t even type the name, because it’s racist.
  Things change.
   The Dutch are having the marmalade debate: on the one hand, to them, the character is part of folklore. A traditional image on a million Christmas cards and celebrated with love and joy in songs and plays. To others, it’s a symbol of repression, racism, colonial legacy and is just plain offensive.
   So it has to change: the genie is out of the bottle and won’t go back. But change takes time: it takes the normalisation of the new ideas. It takes some flailing about to find a new normality.
  This year, Zwarte Pete in his black makeup was joined by ‘Cheese Pete‘, in yellow makeup: an attempt (although not a very successful one) to adapt, to morph the legacy, the tradition, into something new.
  This is how change occurs: by degree or by rift. Currently, there is a debate. A space has been opened up for conversation. Is it change by degree or change by fracture? Will Cheese Pete be one step on the journey, or will a legislative intervention cause a fracture. Will Pete be outlawed, gone the way of the marmalade? Or will he morph into Rainbow Pete. Or maybe Petra.
  Things change.
  When i work in one of the eighty countries where homosexuality is still illegal, i have to remind myself that that was the case in my own country until a few short years before i was born. Indeed, in the year i was born the Canadians were still prototyping a farcical machine that could ‘tell‘ if a new recruit in the army was homosexual. Can you imagine that today?
  Things change.
  But we have to understand how: when we implement organisational culture change programmes, do we understand how change occurs? Do we understand the difference between increment and fracture? Do we create the spaces for the conversation to occur, or do we impose legislative change? And which approach do we think is most effective?
  Sometimes things have to change, but it’s our approach that defines the success. Creating the spaces for the conversation and then listening to what is said. A co-created model. Surely that’s the way.

Ideas Out There

Traditione Innititur Timore: Why School Traditions Are a Really Bad Thing

IMG_3405





The classical man is just a bundle of routine, ideas and tradition. If you follow the classical pattern, you are understanding the routine, the tradition, the shadow — you are not understanding yourself. (BRUCE LEE, Tao of Jeet Kune Do)
  I happened to be involved in a Twitter chat a while ago where concept of ‘tradition’ raised its ugly, wrinkled head. My immediate response to this was a slight case of the mental dry heaves. It took me a few days to process this reaction. Why did I react so badly to a concept that on the surface seems to be a good thing?
  I think, in essence, it was because the mindless throwing about of the term by a group of exciting, dynamic teachers hurt my sense of irony. Twitter chats are about exchanging exciting new ideas in education. Tradition is about keeping out-dated and dangerous practices on life-support.
  What do we mean when we talk about a school’s traditions? Some argue that it is like a safety blanket for students, teachers and administrators alike. They say it helps kids to ‘fit in’ and to feel like they belong, and it gives staff a sense of continuity. It’s an ‘ethos’ that gives a school its character.
This is all a lie.
   Traditions are simply archaic rules that you want to entrench by calling them traditions. Tradition means doing what you’ve always done and obscuring the real reasons you’re doing it. You don’t question a tradition. Traditions are inculcated by schools simply because they make students easier to control. Students can never criticize any of these traditions because they’re traditions. They’re trapped in a circular argument designed to be self-reinforcing.
   It is no coincidence that most traditions are about archaic rules. Tradition means you are able to strictly enforce uniform regulations and that you worry more about the length of a student’s hair and what’s stuck on their faces and in their ears than you do about what’s in their heads. Tradition means war cries and tribalism. It means group-think and conformity, and students become so brainwashed by a school’s traditions that they begin enforcing it themselves.
  It’s classic social engineering.
   Traditions reinforce fear and hierarchy rather than cooperation and intrinsic motivation. It means threats of detention and being ostracized if students don’t comply with the masses. It’s no coincidence that traditions become more venerated as you go up in the hierarchy. It’s also no coincidence that schools label those who push against their traditions as ‘problem cases’.
  Tradition means the subtle sanctioning of bullying through ‘initiations’, ‘senior privileges’, ‘last days’ and other forms of student-on-student violence.
  Tradition means cute Latin mottos that teachers always seem to know better than students, because they use them like mothers use stories of the boogeyman: “Remember, Harold, ‘Progress Through Fortitude’!”
Give me a break.
  By painting a vague veneer of historical significance over what you do, and calling it tradition, you also give credence to outdated practices and pedagogies. You trap the entire school community into not progressing. And sadly, many of them like it this way. Mostly because it’s easier just to fit in than it is to fight.
  In fact, show me any school tradition, and I’ll show you a thinly disguised piece of fear-mongering,psychological manipulation and social engineering.
  And don’t talk to me about ‘Visions’ and ‘Expectations’ and ‘Core Values’ and whatever other word you try to use to mean the same thing.
  And if you still think there are some traditions which are ‘special’ and ‘beautiful’, think about the true purpose which underlies them and then tell me if you still think they have value.
 If you really want your school to be a hive of innovation, meaningful learning and personal growth, then know that such an atmosphere emerges from intentional and sincere collective action, not coercion and mass manipulation. Before you put it on your school’s prospectus and your marketing material, put it into your classrooms, your assessments and your school’s wider curriculum. Develop meaningful school habits that are open to debate and criticism.
  I think for myself, thank you. And want my students to do the same.
  You can keep your traditions.
Every tradition grows ever more venerable – the more remote its origin, the more confused that origin is. The reverence due to it increases from generation to generation. The tradition finally becomes holy and inspires awe. (FRIEDERICH NIETZSCHE, Human, All Too Human)

Source:http://www.notable-quotes.com/t/tradition_quotes.html